Day Hiking the Santa Catalina Mountain Range, Southern Arizona – Photo’s

100_2553 100_2556 100_2557 100_2559 100_2560 100_2561 100_2562 100_2563 100_2564 100_2565 100_2566 100_2567 100_2568 100_2569 100_2570 100_2571 100_2572 100_2573 100_2574 100_2575 100_2576 100_2577 100_2578 100_2579 100_2580 100_2581 100_2582 100_2583 100_2584 100_2585 100_2586 100_2587 100_2588 100_2589 100_2590 100_2591 100_2593 100_2594 100_2595 100_2596 100_2597 100_2598 100_2599 100_2600 100_2601 100_2602 100_2603 100_2604 100_2605 100_2606 100_2607 100_2608 100_2609 100_2610 100_2611 100_2612 100_2613 100_2614 100_2615 100_2616 100_2617 100_2618 100_2619 100_2620 100_2621 100_2622 100_2623 100_2624 100_2625 100_2626 100_2627 100_2628 100_2629 100_2630 100_2631 100_2632 100_2633 100_2634 100_2635 100_2636 100_2637 100_2638 100_2639 100_2640 100_2641 100_2642 100_2643 100_2644 100_2645 100_2646 100_2647 100_2648 100_2649 100_2650 100_2651 100_2652 100_2653 100_2654 100_2655 100_2656 100_2657 100_2658 100_2659 100_2660 100_2661 100_2662 100_2663 100_2664 100_2665 100_2666 100_2667 100_2668 100_2670 100_2671 100_2672 100_2673 100_2674 100_2675 100_2676 100_2677 100_2678 100_2679 100_2680 100_2681 100_2682 100_2683 100_2684 100_2685 100_2686 100_2687 100_2688 100_2689 100_2690 100_2691 100_2692 100_2693 100_2694 100_2695 100_2696 100_2697 100_2698 100_2699 100_2700 100_2701 100_2702 100_2703 100_2704 100_2705 100_2706 100_2707 100_2708 100_2709 100_2710 100_2711 100_2712 100_2713 100_2714 100_2715 100_2716 100_2717 100_2718 100_2719 100_2720 100_2721 100_2722 100_2723 100_2724 100_2725 100_2726 100_2727 100_2728 100_2730 100_2734 100_2736 100_2737 100_2738 100_2739 100_2740 100_2741 100_2742 100_2743 100_2744 100_2745 100_2746 100_2747 100_2748 100_2749 100_2750 100_2751 100_2752 100_2753 100_2755 100_2756 100_2757 100_2758 100_2759 100_2760 100_2761 100_2762 100_2763 100_2764 100_2765 100_2766 100_2767 100_2768 100_2769 100_2770


The concept of capturing solar energy for charging electronic devices while hiking, in theory, is admirable. In practice, however, hiking and solar energy may not necessarily be a marriage made in trail heaven, yet.

The concept of capturing solar energy for charging electronic devices while hiking, in theory, is admirable. In practice, however, hiking and solar energy may not necessarily be a marriage made in trail heaven, yet.

The concept of capturing solar energy for charging electronic devices while hiking, in theory, is admirable. In practice, however, hiking and solar energy may not necessarily be a marriage made in trail heaven, yet.

As a quick note… I utilized the Goal Zero Guide 10/Nomad 7 Adventure kit back in April 2012. I’ve decided that my review, at this time, warrants enough value and relevance for objective consideration. My review, today, is spurred by a Goal Zero consumer display I very recently observed in a local warehouse store.

Auspiciously, the Goal Zero Guide 10/Nomad 7 concept rocks, however, my experience with this kit left me destitute. I first used it on a single night backpacking trip near Tucson, AZ, where the sun regularly shines at least 85% of the time during daylight hours. Therefore, my assumption of harnessing solar power while hiking, that is, capturing and storing solar energy for future use during the course of movement, with the solar panels strapped to the top of my backpack, in theory, is fully substantiated.

In practice, however, there is an entirely different story. Here’s the problem… unless you’re hiking due north all the time the solar rays will never strike your panels 100% of the time. Let us consider this for a moment… If you are hiking due north all the time, your solar panels would indeed capture and harness solar energy 100% of the time you are hiking. If you are hiking due east and/or west, while changing direction with your back always facing south, you’re likely to harness solar energy, conceivably, conservatively, close to 100% of the time, providing your panels are in direct sunlight. Heading south? Forget it. You’re likely, at best, to harvest 50% of the suns rays due to the nature of your bearing (unless your head is similar in size to Beetlejuice, or by uttering “Beetlejuice” three times you’re able to summon the full faith and credit of solar capacity beyond natural capability).

In all sensibility, will anyone ever really hike due north 100% of the time? Plausibly, no, unless you go your own way, off-trail, blazing heroically through the maze of morass, which, incidentally, is too much fun, heading in any direction, in Southern, AZ.

Thus, consider now, cloud cover, changing direction and encumbrances of any kind. In the event you’re not hiking due North 100% of the time, you’re likely to be hiking in any one of 359 (15 alternately possible points) alternatively possible directions. Cloud cover, changing direction, position of the Earth relative to the sun and consequently the time of day, hiking below tree canopy, cliff obscurity, etc., each presenting a serious problem. And, if any one of these particular dilemmas decide to hasten your solar collection activity, you’re essentially, laboriously, hauling equipment you would have been better off without.

This was my problem during my overnight backpacking trip in Southern, AZ where the sun shone for two whole days, and similarly for my day hike down into the Grand Canyon. There may not have been cloud cover but changing direction, position of the sun, tree and cliff cover had all presented a problem. And, considering our latitude I would expect better results than any position north of Arizona. Due, in part, to all of these obscurities I had been unable to achieve a good charge on either the battery pack or my camera, which, incidentally, was attached via USB. Considering all obscurities, my Goal Zero panels were in direct sunlight less than 50% of the time, and quite a bit less, in fact!

By simple law of solar dynamics and encumbrances, I’m making this part up, sort of, or by creating an unfamiliar, new physical natural law, it is essentially irresponsible to expect these solar panels, in this setting, to obtain a sufficient charge while in movement, considering all possible obscurities.

I, objectively, made this mistake and subjectively needed to express my results so that you may decide for yourself, with your set of circumstances, how solar panels may work for you, based on my experience. This, incidentally, is not a review against Goal Zero or solar energy as much as it is the application of using solar panels in the field while hiking.

In contrast, following my day hike in the Grand Canyon, I returned to camp on the rim and spent the next day in camp making every attempt to maintain direct sunlight on the Goal Zero. There were many trees in camp, thus, challenging me, approximately every 15 minutes, to find the best available direct sunlight. The result… I acquired a substantially greater charge, or for that matter a charge, than I did while hiking!

Conclusion… I do not recommend this product for expectations of charging the battery pack or electronic devices while in movement, hiking. If you’re going to carry the solar panel kit anyway, go ahead and strap it to the top of your pack but be prepared to be frustrated when needing to get into the top of your pack and the panels are impeding your progress. I admirably support solar energy and obtaining solar, albeit immobile, while at camp.

Thus, this review and rating of two stars is entirely based on my expectation of acquiring a solar charge while hiking. And, a rating greater than 1 star only because the potential does exist that the panels will obtain minimal charge while hiking, but not enough, in my experience, to obtain a useable amount of energy. This review is exclusive of all features associated with this unit!

Reach Your Summit!